Why Aren’t Aliens Calling Earth?

Why Aren’t Aliens Calling Earth? – Weโ€™ve been conditioned by television and movies to accept the likelihood of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. โ€œOf course thereโ€™s intelligent life out there; I saw it last week on Star Trek.โ€ Weโ€™ve seen it all, from the cute and cuddly ET to the fanged monstrosity of Alien. But is it likely that weโ€™re not alone in the universe? And if intelligent life is out there, why havenโ€™t they contacted us yet?

The first person to address this question in a systematic way was Frank Drake, who invented the Drake equation to predict the number of extraterrestrial civilizations in the galaxy. His equation is rather complicated, but hereโ€™s a simple version of his argument.

First, letโ€™s count how many stars are in the galaxy. To quote one of my predecessors, โ€œBillions upon billions!โ€ And how many of those stars have planets? Until recently, we really didnโ€™t know. But over the past 20 years, astronomers have made remarkable progress in discovering planets around other stars. We now know that many stars have planets orbiting them.

Water Bear or Tardigrade
Water bear (Paramacrobiotus craterlaki) in moss. Color enhanced scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a water bear in its active state. Water bears (or tardigrades) are tiny invertebrates that live in aquatic and semi-aquatic habitats such as lichen and damp moss. They require water to obtain oxygen by gas exchange. In dry conditions, they can enter a cryptobiotic state of desiccation, known as a tun, to survive. In this state, water bears can survive for up to a decade. P. craterlaki is a carnivorous species that feeds on nematodes and rotifers. This specimen originated from moss samples in Crater Lake, Kenya. Water bears are found throughout the world, including regions of extreme temperature, such as hot springs, and extreme pressure, such as deep underwater. They can also survive high levels of radiation and the vacuum of space. Magnification: x333 when printed 10cm wide..

Could creatures actually live on any of those planets? Many of them are just giant balls of gas, or else too hot or too cold to contain liquid water, which is the basis of all life on Earth. But a few of them do seem to be at the right temperature. These are the Goldilocks planets: not too hot and not too cold for liquid water. (And thatโ€™s without even considering the possibility that exotic forms of life could survive without water.)

Now we enter murkier territory. How likely is it that life will develop on a potentially habitable planet? We donโ€™t know the answer, but life on Earth got going very shortly after the formation of our solar system, and it has wedged itself into every available niche, no matter how hostile.

Colonies of bizarre creatures flourish in perpetual darkness near deep ocean vents, where superheated sulfur-rich water spews from under the ground. Radiation-resistant bacteria bask happily in levels of radioactivity that would instantly kill a human being. And then thereโ€™s the tardigrade, which looks like a microscopic eight-legged teddy bear, that can thrive in liquid nitrogen or boiling alcohol. So the probability of life developing on habitable worlds seems very high.

And how likely is it that this life will develop intelligence? This remains an open question (which is scientist-speak for โ€œwe havenโ€™t got a clueโ€). But many scientists consider intelligent life almost inevitable, in which case the galaxy should be teaming with alien civilizations.

If the galaxy is crawling with aliens, where are they? Interstellar travel is limited by the speed of light, so maybe itโ€™s no surprise that no one has visited us. But we should at least be able to detect alien radio signals, either from attempts to contact us directly, or in the form of alien TV reruns. Why havenโ€™t our alien friends contacted us? This question was famously asked by the Italian physicist Enrico Fermi, so itโ€™s called the Fermi paradox: all of our arguments suggest that alien civilizations should be common, yet weโ€™ve seen no sign of them.

One possibility is that intelligent life really is rare. My own personal opinion (and itโ€™s just an opinion) is that life is common, but intelligent life is rare (something many of us suspect based on our own experience). While life developed in the relative blink of an eye after the birth of the solar system, it took billions of years before we smarties showed up on the scene. And remember that โ€œsurvival of the fittestโ€ doesnโ€™t always mean โ€œsurvival of the smartest.โ€ While intelligence is certainly a useful survival trait, it seems far from inevitable. If not for an errant asteroid, the dinosaurs might still rule the world.

Another possibility is that intelligent life inevitably destroys itself. Until recently, our options for total self-destruction were limited to nuclear weapons. But we are on the edge of expanding our armada to include genetically engineered viruses (think: Ebola meets the common cold!).

And consider the dangers posed by nanomachines, tiny self-replicating robots programmed to convert matter into more robots. Imagine a tiny robot, no bigger than the width of a human hair, designed to provide some useful function, programmed to build a copy of itself, using materials from its environment. Now you have two machines, and both can create duplicates, giving us four machines. But what if this process got out of control? The nanomachines could rapidly consume the entire Earth, converting it, along with everyone on the planet, into โ€œgrey goo.โ€ British astronomer Martin Rees discusses these and other catastrophic possibilities in his book, Our Final Hour. Have all our potential alien visitors succumbed to self-destruction?

aliens-like-us-image

Or is it possible that the galaxy really does contain other forms of intelligent life, but something prevents contact with us? Here we enter the realm of more speculative ideas. (Translation: when a scientist says โ€œspeculative,โ€ it really means โ€œa very interesting idea thatโ€™s only one step removed from complete nonsense.โ€)

Among the more speculative possibilities: maybe the galaxy is a dangerous place, full of robotic probes sent out by hostile aliens to wipe out any competition, so everyone else is in hiding. Perhaps we really shouldnโ€™t have put a detailed description of the location of our solar system on our own space probes. Itโ€™s a bad idea to reach out and try to touch ET when we might get a call from the Alien instead.

An even more bizarre suggestion is that superior civilizations have decided to avoid contact with lesser beings such as ourselves, so that we live in a kind of cosmic zoo, complete with a โ€œDo not talk to the animalsโ€ sign.

code-the-matrix

Some have even suggested that we live in a gigantic computer simulation, a la The Matrix.

A longer list of possibilities (along with a skeptical discussion) has been compiled by astronomer Milan ฤ†irkoviฤ‡.

Without more data, the Fermi paradox will remain, for now, unresolved, and many of the proposed solutions will have to be classified as โ€œspeculative.โ€ And now you know exactly what that means.

Robert Scherrer is Professor and Chair of Physics and Astronomy at Vanderbilt University.

Source: space

spot_img

More like this

life-earth-may-started-cosmic-splash

Life on Earth May Have Started with a Cosmic...

Life on Earth May Have Started with a Cosmic Splash: A new study bolsters the theory that...
mars-curiosity-facts-information

Mars Curiosity: Facts and Information

Mars Curiosity: Facts and Information: The Mars Science Laboratory and its rover centerpiece, Curiosity, is the most...

This Is Why Sending Messages to Aliens Might Be...

This Is Why Sending Messages to Aliens Might Be a Good Idea: Are we alone in the...